PUSH trial limits: why fluids still matter – Authors' reply

Charles D Scales, Alana C Desai, Peter P Reese, John C Lieske, Gregory E Tasian

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1
Published: 2026-08
Container: The Lancet
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-26-01282-1,
  title = {PUSH trial limits: why fluids still matter – Authors' reply},
  author = {Charles D Scales and Alana C Desai and Peter P Reese and John C Lieske and Gregory E Tasian},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {The Lancet},
  doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - PUSH trial limits: why fluids still matter – Authors' reply
AU  - Charles D Scales
AU  - Alana C Desai
AU  - Peter P Reese
AU  - John C Lieske
AU  - Gregory E Tasian
PY  - 2026
JO  - The Lancet
DO  - 10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1
ER  -

APA

Scales, C. D., Desai, A. C., Reese, P. P., Lieske, J. C., & Tasian, G. E. (2026). PUSH trial limits: why fluids still matter – Authors' reply. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01282-1

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:43:24.457Z