Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7
- Published
- 1996-11
- Container
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-96-05016-7,
title = {Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde},
author = {Jean-Pierre EN Pierie and Henk C Walvoort and A John PM Overbeke},
year = {1996},
journal = {The Lancet},
doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde AU - Jean-Pierre EN Pierie AU - Henk C Walvoort AU - A John PM Overbeke PY - 1996 JO - The Lancet DO - 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7 ER -
APA
Pierie, J. E., Walvoort, H. C., & Overbeke, A. J. P. (1996). Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05016-7
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:20:22.137Z