The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.

Bornstein BH, Muller SL

DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4
Published: 2001 Nov
Container: Child abuse & neglect
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0145-2134-01-00282-4,
  title = {The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.},
  author = {Bornstein BH and Muller SL},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {Child abuse \& neglect},
  doi = {10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.
AU  - Bornstein BH
AU  - Muller SL
PY  - 2001
JO  - Child abuse & neglect
DO  - 10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4
ER  -

APA

BH, B., & SL, M. (2001). The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.. Child abuse & neglect. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00282-4

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:24:35.835Z