The role of decision analysis in informed consent: choosing between intuition and systematicity.

Ubel PA, Loewenstein G

DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1
Published: 1997 Mar
Container: Social science & medicine (1982)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0277-9536-96-00217-1,
  title = {The role of decision analysis in informed consent: choosing between intuition and systematicity.},
  author = {Ubel PA and Loewenstein G},
  year = {1997},
  journal = {Social science \& medicine (1982)},
  doi = {10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The role of decision analysis in informed consent: choosing between intuition and systematicity.
AU  - Ubel PA
AU  - Loewenstein G
PY  - 1997
JO  - Social science & medicine (1982)
DO  - 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1
ER  -

APA

PA, U., & G, L. (1997). The role of decision analysis in informed consent: choosing between intuition and systematicity.. Social science & medicine (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00217-1

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:12:57.685Z