Comparison of pregnancy outcome in mares among methods used to evaluate and select spermatozoa for insemination

G.J. Nie, J.G.W. Wenzel, K.E. Johnson

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4
Published: 2002-02
Container: Animal Reproduction Science
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0378-4320-01-00180-4,
  title = {Comparison of pregnancy outcome in mares among methods used to evaluate and select spermatozoa for insemination},
  author = {G.J. Nie and J.G.W. Wenzel and K.E. Johnson},
  year = {2002},
  journal = {Animal Reproduction Science},
  doi = {10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of pregnancy outcome in mares among methods used to evaluate and select spermatozoa for insemination
AU  - G.J. Nie
AU  - J.G.W. Wenzel
AU  - K.E. Johnson
PY  - 2002
JO  - Animal Reproduction Science
DO  - 10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4
ER  -

APA

Nie, G., Wenzel, J., & Johnson, K. (2002). Comparison of pregnancy outcome in mares among methods used to evaluate and select spermatozoa for insemination. Animal Reproduction Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00180-4

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:37:08.737Z