Comparison of Different Foreground and Background Selection Methods in Marker-Assisted Introgression

BAI Jun-Yan, ZHANG Qin, JIA Xiao-Ping

Open source

DOI
10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3
Published
2006-12
Container
Acta Genetica Sinica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0379-4172-06-60144-3,
  title = {Comparison of Different Foreground and Background Selection Methods in Marker-Assisted Introgression},
  author = {BAI Jun-Yan and ZHANG Qin and JIA Xiao-Ping},
  year = {2006},
  journal = {Acta Genetica Sinica},
  doi = {10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Different Foreground and Background Selection Methods in Marker-Assisted Introgression
AU  - BAI Jun-Yan
AU  - ZHANG Qin
AU  - JIA Xiao-Ping
PY  - 2006
JO  - Acta Genetica Sinica
DO  - 10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3
ER  - 

APA

Jun-Yan, B., Qin, Z., & Xiao-Ping, J. (2006). Comparison of Different Foreground and Background Selection Methods in Marker-Assisted Introgression. Acta Genetica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60144-3

Source records