Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.
- DOI
- 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0
- Published
- 2000 May
- Container
- The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s1070-3241-00-26024-0,
title = {Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.},
author = {Smith DP and Rogers G and Dreyfus A and Glasser J and Rabson BG and Derbyshire L},
year = {2000},
journal = {The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement},
doi = {10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts. AU - Smith DP AU - Rogers G AU - Dreyfus A AU - Glasser J AU - Rabson BG AU - Derbyshire L PY - 2000 JO - The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement DO - 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0 ER -
APA
DP, S., G, R., A, D., J, G., BG, R., & L, D. (2000). Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.. The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26024-0
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T20:24:50.240Z