Intention-to-diagnose and distinct research foci in diagnostic accuracy studies.
- DOI
- 10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2
- Published
- 2025 Aug
- Container
- The Lancet. Infectious diseases
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s1473-3099-25-00070-2,
title = {Intention-to-diagnose and distinct research foci in diagnostic accuracy studies.},
author = {Evans SR and Pennello G and Zhang S and Li Y and Wang Y and Cao Q and Komarow L and Hamasaki T and Petrides V and Meier K and Galicia NP and Fowler VG Jr and Boucher HW and Doernberg SB and Banerjee R and Rigatto MH and Kreiswirth BN and Bonomo RA and Chambers HF and Patel R},
year = {2025},
journal = {The Lancet. Infectious diseases},
doi = {10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Intention-to-diagnose and distinct research foci in diagnostic accuracy studies. AU - Evans SR AU - Pennello G AU - Zhang S AU - Li Y AU - Wang Y AU - Cao Q AU - Komarow L AU - Hamasaki T AU - Petrides V AU - Meier K AU - Galicia NP AU - Fowler VG Jr AU - Boucher HW AU - Doernberg SB AU - Banerjee R AU - Rigatto MH AU - Kreiswirth BN AU - Bonomo RA AU - Chambers HF AU - Patel R PY - 2025 JO - The Lancet. Infectious diseases DO - 10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2 ER -
APA
SR, E., G, P., S, Z., Y, L., Y, W., Q, C., L, K., T, H., V, P., K, M., NP, G., Jr, F. V., HW, B., SB, D., R, B., MH, R., BN, K., RA, B., HF, C., & R, P. (2025). Intention-to-diagnose and distinct research foci in diagnostic accuracy studies.. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(25)00070-2
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T09:30:11.164Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T09:30:11.165Z