COPD case finding: effective, but also cost-effective? - Authors' reply.
- DOI
- 10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Container
- Lancet Respir Med
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s2213-2600-16-30267-3,
title = {COPD case finding: effective, but also cost-effective? - Authors' reply.},
author = {Jordan RE and Jowett S and Fitzmaurice D and Adab P and Birmingham Lung Improvement Study (BLISS) Research team.},
year = {2016},
journal = {Lancet Respir Med},
doi = {10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - COPD case finding: effective, but also cost-effective? - Authors' reply. AU - Jordan RE AU - Jowett S AU - Fitzmaurice D AU - Adab P AU - Birmingham Lung Improvement Study (BLISS) Research team. PY - 2016 JO - Lancet Respir Med DO - 10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3 ER -
APA
RE, J., S, J., D, F., P, A., & team., B. L. I. S. (. R. (2016). COPD case finding: effective, but also cost-effective? - Authors' reply.. Lancet Respir Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30267-3
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T06:01:59.081Z