Challenges and recommendations to improve institutional review boards' review of community-engaged research proposals: A scoping review.
- DOI
- 10.1017/cts.2023.516
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Journal of clinical and translational science
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/cts.2023.516,
title = {Challenges and recommendations to improve institutional review boards' review of community-engaged research proposals: A scoping review.},
author = {Onakomaiya D and Pan J and Roberts T and Tan H and Nadkarni S and Godina M and Park J and Fraser M and Kwon SC and Schoenthaler A and Islam N},
year = {2023},
journal = {Journal of clinical and translational science},
doi = {10.1017/cts.2023.516},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.516}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Challenges and recommendations to improve institutional review boards' review of community-engaged research proposals: A scoping review. AU - Onakomaiya D AU - Pan J AU - Roberts T AU - Tan H AU - Nadkarni S AU - Godina M AU - Park J AU - Fraser M AU - Kwon SC AU - Schoenthaler A AU - Islam N PY - 2023 JO - Journal of clinical and translational science DO - 10.1017/cts.2023.516 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.516 ER -
APA
D, O., J, P., T, R., H, T., S, N., M, G., J, P., M, F., SC, K., A, S., & N, I. (2023). Challenges and recommendations to improve institutional review boards' review of community-engaged research proposals: A scoping review.. Journal of clinical and translational science. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.516
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:45:10.531Z