Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?

Hugo Mercier, Olivier Morin

Open source

DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2019.6
Published: 2019
Container: Evolutionary Human Sciences
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/ehs.2019.6,
  title = {Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?},
  author = {Hugo Mercier and Olivier Morin},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {Evolutionary Human Sciences},
  doi = {10.1017/ehs.2019.6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.6}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?
AU  - Hugo Mercier
AU  - Olivier Morin
PY  - 2019
JO  - Evolutionary Human Sciences
DO  - 10.1017/ehs.2019.6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.6
ER  -

APA

Mercier, H., & Morin, O. (2019). Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?. Evolutionary Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.6

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:40:56.738Z