Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms.
- DOI
- 10.1017/rsm.2025.10019
- Published
- 2025 Sep
- Container
- Research synthesis methods
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/rsm.2025.10019,
title = {Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms.},
author = {Nelson G and Quinn S and Grant S and Trevino SD and Day E and Schweer-Collins M and Carter H and Boedeker P and Tanner-Smith E},
year = {2025},
journal = {Research synthesis methods},
doi = {10.1017/rsm.2025.10019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2025.10019}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms. AU - Nelson G AU - Quinn S AU - Grant S AU - Trevino SD AU - Day E AU - Schweer-Collins M AU - Carter H AU - Boedeker P AU - Tanner-Smith E PY - 2025 JO - Research synthesis methods DO - 10.1017/rsm.2025.10019 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2025.10019 ER -
APA
G, N., S, Q., S, G., SD, T., E, D., M, S., H, C., P, B., & E, T. (2025). Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms.. Research synthesis methods. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2025.10019
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:53:20.006Z