Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study
- DOI
- 10.1017/rsm.2026.10100
- Published
- 2026-06-17
- Container
- Research Synthesis Methods
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/rsm.2026.10100,
title = {Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study},
author = {Sarah Bateup and Helen Fulbright and Klas Moberg and Kaitlyn Hair and Emmy Peterson and Claire M. Stansfield and Riaz Qureshi and Justin Clark},
year = {2026},
journal = {Research Synthesis Methods},
doi = {10.1017/rsm.2026.10100},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2026.10100}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study AU - Sarah Bateup AU - Helen Fulbright AU - Klas Moberg AU - Kaitlyn Hair AU - Emmy Peterson AU - Claire M. Stansfield AU - Riaz Qureshi AU - Justin Clark PY - 2026 JO - Research Synthesis Methods DO - 10.1017/rsm.2026.10100 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2026.10100 ER -
APA
Bateup, S., Fulbright, H., Moberg, K., Hair, K., Peterson, E., Stansfield, C. M., Qureshi, R., & Clark, J. (2026). Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study. Research Synthesis Methods. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2026.10100
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:48:59.183Z