The great neglect: the fate of Mendel's classic paper between 1865 and 1900.

Posner E, Skutil J

DOI: 10.1017/s0025727300013016
Published: 1968 Apr
Container: Medical history
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/s0025727300013016,
  title = {The great neglect: the fate of Mendel's classic paper between 1865 and 1900.},
  author = {Posner E and Skutil J},
  year = {1968},
  journal = {Medical history},
  doi = {10.1017/s0025727300013016},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300013016}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The great neglect: the fate of Mendel's classic paper between 1865 and 1900.
AU  - Posner E
AU  - Skutil J
PY  - 1968
JO  - Medical history
DO  - 10.1017/s0025727300013016
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300013016
ER  -

APA

E, P., & J, S. (1968). The great neglect: the fate of Mendel's classic paper between 1865 and 1900.. Medical history. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300013016

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:14:10.558Z