Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical question.

Chan SKS, Cyrus-Lai W, Schaerer M, van Aert RCM, van Assen M, Uhlmann EL.

DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x25104135
Published: 2026-07-03
Container: Behav Brain Sci
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/s0140525x25104135,
  title = {Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical question.},
  author = {Chan SKS and  Cyrus-Lai W and  Schaerer M and  van Aert RCM and  van Assen M and  Uhlmann EL.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Behav Brain Sci},
  doi = {10.1017/s0140525x25104135},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x25104135}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical question.
AU  - Chan SKS
AU  -  Cyrus-Lai W
AU  -  Schaerer M
AU  -  van Aert RCM
AU  -  van Assen M
AU  -  Uhlmann EL.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Behav Brain Sci
DO  - 10.1017/s0140525x25104135
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x25104135
ER  -

APA

SKS, C., W, C., M, S., RCM, V. A., M, V. A., & EL., U. (2026). Cross-cultural generalizability is an empirical question.. Behav Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x25104135

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:15:38.132Z