Comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron, propofol and midazolam in the early postoperative period.

Unlugenc H, Guler T, Gunes Y, Isik G

DOI: 10.1017/s0265021504001103
Published: 2004 Jan
Container: European journal of anaesthesiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 8/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/s0265021504001103,
  title = {Comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron, propofol and midazolam in the early postoperative period.},
  author = {Unlugenc H and Guler T and Gunes Y and Isik G},
  year = {2004},
  journal = {European journal of anaesthesiology},
  doi = {10.1017/s0265021504001103},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021504001103}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron, propofol and midazolam in the early postoperative period.
AU  - Unlugenc H
AU  - Guler T
AU  - Gunes Y
AU  - Isik G
PY  - 2004
JO  - European journal of anaesthesiology
DO  - 10.1017/s0265021504001103
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021504001103
ER  -

APA

H, U., T, G., Y, G., & G, I. (2004). Comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron, propofol and midazolam in the early postoperative period.. European journal of anaesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021504001103

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T16:37:09.648Z