Early technology review during prototype development and at proof of concept: the case for developing a sequential versus a single-stage approach to early evidence development for health technologies.
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0266462326103596
- Published
- 2026 Apr 22
- Container
- International journal of technology assessment in health care
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/s0266462326103596,
title = {Early technology review during prototype development and at proof of concept: the case for developing a sequential versus a single-stage approach to early evidence development for health technologies.},
author = {Levin L and McDonough RS and Cheatle M and Kaafarani H and Korjian S and Kuntz RE},
year = {2026},
journal = {International journal of technology assessment in health care},
doi = {10.1017/s0266462326103596},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462326103596}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Early technology review during prototype development and at proof of concept: the case for developing a sequential versus a single-stage approach to early evidence development for health technologies. AU - Levin L AU - McDonough RS AU - Cheatle M AU - Kaafarani H AU - Korjian S AU - Kuntz RE PY - 2026 JO - International journal of technology assessment in health care DO - 10.1017/s0266462326103596 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462326103596 ER -
APA
L, L., RS, M., M, C., H, K., S, K., & RE, K. (2026). Early technology review during prototype development and at proof of concept: the case for developing a sequential versus a single-stage approach to early evidence development for health technologies.. International journal of technology assessment in health care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462326103596
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:32:56.708Z