A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
- DOI
- 10.1017/s0950268826101551
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- Container
- Epidemiol Infect
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/s0950268826101551,
title = {A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.},
author = {Rousou X and Furuya-Kanamori L and Kostoulas P and Doi SAR and Meletis E and Solomakos N.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Epidemiol Infect},
doi = {10.1017/s0950268826101551},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. AU - Rousou X AU - Furuya-Kanamori L AU - Kostoulas P AU - Doi SAR AU - Meletis E AU - Solomakos N. PY - 2026 JO - Epidemiol Infect DO - 10.1017/s0950268826101551 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551 ER -
APA
X, R., L, F., P, K., SAR, D., E, M., & N., S. (2026). A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.. Epidemiol Infect. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:59:36.562Z