A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Rousou X, Furuya-Kanamori L, Kostoulas P, Doi SAR, Meletis E, Solomakos N.

Open source

DOI
10.1017/s0950268826101551
Published
2026-04-30
Container
Epidemiol Infect
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/s0950268826101551,
  title = {A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.},
  author = {Rousou X and  Furuya-Kanamori L and  Kostoulas P and  Doi SAR and  Meletis E and  Solomakos N.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Epidemiol Infect},
  doi = {10.1017/s0950268826101551},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
AU  - Rousou X
AU  -  Furuya-Kanamori L
AU  -  Kostoulas P
AU  -  Doi SAR
AU  -  Meletis E
AU  -  Solomakos N.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Epidemiol Infect
DO  - 10.1017/s0950268826101551
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551
ER  - 

APA

X, R., L, F., P, K., SAR, D., E, M., & N., S. (2026). A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.. Epidemiol Infect. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268826101551

Source records