Two slits good, four slits bad? Assessing the hemodynamic impact of modifications to microvascular plugs in pulmonary flow restriction using a bench-top model
- DOI
- 10.1017/s1047951126123932
- Published
- 2026-09-24
- Container
- Cardiology in the Young
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1017/s1047951126123932,
title = {Two slits good, four slits bad? Assessing the hemodynamic impact of modifications to microvascular plugs in pulmonary flow restriction using a bench-top model},
author = {Natalie Soszyn and Sungho Park and Catalina Vargas Acevedo and Ernesto Mejia and Alex Barker and Jenny Zablah and Gareth Morgan},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cardiology in the Young},
doi = {10.1017/s1047951126123932},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951126123932}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Two slits good, four slits bad? Assessing the hemodynamic impact of modifications to microvascular plugs in pulmonary flow restriction using a bench-top model AU - Natalie Soszyn AU - Sungho Park AU - Catalina Vargas Acevedo AU - Ernesto Mejia AU - Alex Barker AU - Jenny Zablah AU - Gareth Morgan PY - 2026 JO - Cardiology in the Young DO - 10.1017/s1047951126123932 UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951126123932 ER -
APA
Soszyn, N., Park, S., Acevedo, C. V., Mejia, E., Barker, A., Zablah, J., & Morgan, G. (2026). Two slits good, four slits bad? Assessing the hemodynamic impact of modifications to microvascular plugs in pulmonary flow restriction using a bench-top model. Cardiology in the Young. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951126123932
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:08:36.395Z