A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR TESTING THE UTILITY MAXIMIZATION HYPOTHESIS WHEN QUANTITY DATA ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR

Philippe de Peretti

DOI: 10.1017/s1365100505040381
Published: 2005
Container: Macroeconomic Dynamics
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1017/s1365100505040381,
  title = {A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR TESTING THE UTILITY MAXIMIZATION HYPOTHESIS WHEN QUANTITY DATA ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR},
  author = {Philippe de Peretti},
  year = {2005},
  journal = {Macroeconomic Dynamics},
  doi = {10.1017/s1365100505040381},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100505040381}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR TESTING THE UTILITY MAXIMIZATION HYPOTHESIS WHEN QUANTITY DATA ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR
AU  - Philippe de Peretti
PY  - 2005
JO  - Macroeconomic Dynamics
DO  - 10.1017/s1365100505040381
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100505040381
ER  -

APA

Peretti, P. D. (2005). A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR TESTING THE UTILITY MAXIMIZATION HYPOTHESIS WHEN QUANTITY DATA ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR. Macroeconomic Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100505040381

Source records

hal · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:02:49.309Z