Strengthening Key Technologies versus Process Reformations: A Comparison of the Low-Carbon Transition Pathways of China's Iron and Steel Industry.
- DOI
- 10.1021/acs.est.6c02445
- Published
- 2026 Sep 15
- Container
- Environmental science & technology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.est.6c02445,
title = {Strengthening Key Technologies versus Process Reformations: A Comparison of the Low-Carbon Transition Pathways of China's Iron and Steel Industry.},
author = {Chang Y and Mao X and Yang S and Chen Y and Duman Z and Hu Y and Si X and Gao Y},
year = {2026},
journal = {Environmental science \& technology},
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.6c02445},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02445}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Strengthening Key Technologies versus Process Reformations: A Comparison of the Low-Carbon Transition Pathways of China's Iron and Steel Industry. AU - Chang Y AU - Mao X AU - Yang S AU - Chen Y AU - Duman Z AU - Hu Y AU - Si X AU - Gao Y PY - 2026 JO - Environmental science & technology DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6c02445 UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02445 ER -
APA
Y, C., X, M., S, Y., Y, C., Z, D., Y, H., X, S., & Y, G. (2026). Strengthening Key Technologies versus Process Reformations: A Comparison of the Low-Carbon Transition Pathways of China's Iron and Steel Industry.. Environmental science & technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02445
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:36:26.404Z