Why Does CoII Work Better than NiII for Activation of CO2 in the Presence of Bipyridyl-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Framework? Expanding the Metal Scope with FeII.

Ranaut S, Kooleri A, Mazumder S

Open source

DOI
10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760
Published
2026 Sep 7
Container
Inorganic chemistry
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760,
  title = {Why Does CoII Work Better than NiII for Activation of CO2 in the Presence of Bipyridyl-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Framework? Expanding the Metal Scope with FeII.},
  author = {Ranaut S and Kooleri A and Mazumder S},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Inorganic chemistry},
  doi = {10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why Does CoII Work Better than NiII for Activation of CO2 in the Presence of Bipyridyl-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Framework? Expanding the Metal Scope with FeII.
AU  - Ranaut S
AU  - Kooleri A
AU  - Mazumder S
PY  - 2026
JO  - Inorganic chemistry
DO  - 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760
ER  - 

APA

S, R., A, K., & S, M. (2026). Why Does CoII Work Better than NiII for Activation of CO2 in the Presence of Bipyridyl-N-Heterocyclic Carbene Framework? Expanding the Metal Scope with FeII.. Inorganic chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02760

Source records