Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.

Folmsbee DL, Koes DR, Hutchison GR

Open source

DOI
10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278
Published
2023 Dec 11
Container
Journal of chemical information and modeling
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278,
  title = {Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.},
  author = {Folmsbee DL and Koes DR and Hutchison GR},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Journal of chemical information and modeling},
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.
AU  - Folmsbee DL
AU  - Koes DR
AU  - Hutchison GR
PY  - 2023
JO  - Journal of chemical information and modeling
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278
ER  - 

APA

DL, F., DR, K., & GR, H. (2023). Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.. Journal of chemical information and modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278

Source records