Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.
- DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278
- Published
- 2023 Dec 11
- Container
- Journal of chemical information and modeling
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278,
title = {Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.},
author = {Folmsbee DL and Koes DR and Hutchison GR},
year = {2023},
journal = {Journal of chemical information and modeling},
doi = {10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences. AU - Folmsbee DL AU - Koes DR AU - Hutchison GR PY - 2023 JO - Journal of chemical information and modeling DO - 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278 UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278 ER -
APA
DL, F., DR, K., & GR, H. (2023). Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.. Journal of chemical information and modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01278
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:56:03.321Z