Potential-Averaged ΔSCF Methods: Underlying Formalism and Evaluation of Accuracy of Excitation Energies.

Trushin E, Bertleff O, Görling A.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983
Published: 2026-08-01
Container: J Chem Theory Comput
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983,
  title = {Potential-Averaged ΔSCF Methods: Underlying Formalism and Evaluation of Accuracy of Excitation Energies.},
  author = {Trushin E and  Bertleff O and  Görling A.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {J Chem Theory Comput},
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Potential-Averaged ΔSCF Methods: Underlying Formalism and Evaluation of Accuracy of Excitation Energies.
AU  - Trushin E
AU  -  Bertleff O
AU  -  Görling A.
PY  - 2026
JO  - J Chem Theory Comput
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983
ER  -

APA

E, T., O, B., & A., G. (2026). Potential-Averaged ΔSCF Methods: Underlying Formalism and Evaluation of Accuracy of Excitation Energies.. J Chem Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00983

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:46:48.794Z