Benchmarking the OptiSpray-μPAC Workflow against a Traditional Nanospray Capillary Interface for Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.

Walker KL, Schroeter CB, Zheng R, Silveira JA, Wouters ER, Paulo JA

Open source

DOI
10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473
Published
2026 Sep 4
Container
Journal of proteome research
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473,
  title = {Benchmarking the OptiSpray-μPAC Workflow against a Traditional Nanospray Capillary Interface for Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.},
  author = {Walker KL and Schroeter CB and Zheng R and Silveira JA and Wouters ER and Paulo JA},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of proteome research},
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Benchmarking the OptiSpray-μPAC Workflow against a Traditional Nanospray Capillary Interface for Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.
AU  - Walker KL
AU  - Schroeter CB
AU  - Zheng R
AU  - Silveira JA
AU  - Wouters ER
AU  - Paulo JA
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of proteome research
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473
ER  - 

APA

KL, W., CB, S., R, Z., JA, S., ER, W., & JA, P. (2026). Benchmarking the OptiSpray-μPAC Workflow against a Traditional Nanospray Capillary Interface for Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics.. Journal of proteome research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00473

Source records