Assessing the Feasibility of Bioscrubbing for Flue Gas Treatment and Sulfur Recovery: A Comparative Study Using Mathematical Modeling, Life Cycle Analysis, and Life Cycle Costing
- DOI
- 10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216
- Published
- 2025-12-22
- Container
- ACS Environmental Au
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216,
title = {Assessing the Feasibility of Bioscrubbing for Flue Gas Treatment and Sulfur Recovery: A Comparative Study Using Mathematical Modeling, Life Cycle Analysis, and Life Cycle Costing},
author = {Alessio Castagnoli and Eric Valdés and Francesco Pasciucco and Isabella Pecorini and Daniel González Alé and Giulio Munz and David Gabriel},
year = {2025},
journal = {ACS Environmental Au},
doi = {10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the Feasibility of Bioscrubbing for Flue Gas Treatment and Sulfur Recovery: A Comparative Study Using Mathematical Modeling, Life Cycle Analysis, and Life Cycle Costing AU - Alessio Castagnoli AU - Eric Valdés AU - Francesco Pasciucco AU - Isabella Pecorini AU - Daniel González Alé AU - Giulio Munz AU - David Gabriel PY - 2025 JO - ACS Environmental Au DO - 10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216 UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216 ER -
APA
Castagnoli, A., Valdés, E., Pasciucco, F., Pecorini, I., Alé, D. G., Munz, G., & Gabriel, D. (2025). Assessing the Feasibility of Bioscrubbing for Flue Gas Treatment and Sulfur Recovery: A Comparative Study Using Mathematical Modeling, Life Cycle Analysis, and Life Cycle Costing. ACS Environmental Au. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00216
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:36:21.613Z