Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience.
- DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x
- Published
- 2001 Jan
- Container
- Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x,
title = {Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience.},
author = {Varga P and Bódis J},
year = {2001},
journal = {Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica},
doi = {10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience. AU - Varga P AU - Bódis J PY - 2001 JO - Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x UR - https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x ER -
APA
P, V., & J, B. (2001). Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience.. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:42:06.559Z