Accuracy in amicus curiae briefs and in commentaries: Reply to Cobb et al. (2025), Dvoskin et al. (2025), and Kovera (2025).
- DOI
- 10.1037/amp0001595
- Published
- 2025 Oct
- Container
- The American psychologist
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1037/amp0001595,
title = {Accuracy in amicus curiae briefs and in commentaries: Reply to Cobb et al. (2025), Dvoskin et al. (2025), and Kovera (2025).},
author = {Marcus DK and Strand PS and Monaghan KL and Murphy MB and Leman TY and Barry CT},
year = {2025},
journal = {The American psychologist},
doi = {10.1037/amp0001595},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001595}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Accuracy in amicus curiae briefs and in commentaries: Reply to Cobb et al. (2025), Dvoskin et al. (2025), and Kovera (2025). AU - Marcus DK AU - Strand PS AU - Monaghan KL AU - Murphy MB AU - Leman TY AU - Barry CT PY - 2025 JO - The American psychologist DO - 10.1037/amp0001595 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001595 ER -
APA
DK, M., PS, S., KL, M., MB, M., TY, L., & CT, B. (2025). Accuracy in amicus curiae briefs and in commentaries: Reply to Cobb et al. (2025), Dvoskin et al. (2025), and Kovera (2025).. The American psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001595
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T09:18:57.980Z