How behavioral differences between autistic and nonautistic suspects in forensic interviews affect observers' evaluations: Evidence for expectancy violations theory but not the double empathy hypothesis.
- DOI
- 10.1037/lhb0000679
- Published
- 2026 Sep 21
- Container
- Law and human behavior
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1037/lhb0000679,
title = {How behavioral differences between autistic and nonautistic suspects in forensic interviews affect observers' evaluations: Evidence for expectancy violations theory but not the double empathy hypothesis.},
author = {Brewer N and Lucas CA and Logos K and Young RL and Lim A},
year = {2026},
journal = {Law and human behavior},
doi = {10.1037/lhb0000679},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000679}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How behavioral differences between autistic and nonautistic suspects in forensic interviews affect observers' evaluations: Evidence for expectancy violations theory but not the double empathy hypothesis. AU - Brewer N AU - Lucas CA AU - Logos K AU - Young RL AU - Lim A PY - 2026 JO - Law and human behavior DO - 10.1037/lhb0000679 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000679 ER -
APA
N, B., CA, L., K, L., RL, Y., & A, L. (2026). How behavioral differences between autistic and nonautistic suspects in forensic interviews affect observers' evaluations: Evidence for expectancy violations theory but not the double empathy hypothesis.. Law and human behavior. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000679
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T18:54:29.174Z