Positionality statements: Intersectional considerations for rehabilitation psychology.
- DOI
- 10.1037/rep0000569
- Published
- 2025-02
- Container
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1037/rep0000569,
title = {Positionality statements: Intersectional considerations for rehabilitation psychology.},
author = {Emily M. Lund and Christopher R. DeJesus and Mana K. Ali Carter and Lauren R. Khazem},
year = {2025},
journal = {Rehabilitation Psychology},
doi = {10.1037/rep0000569},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000569}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Positionality statements: Intersectional considerations for rehabilitation psychology. AU - Emily M. Lund AU - Christopher R. DeJesus AU - Mana K. Ali Carter AU - Lauren R. Khazem PY - 2025 JO - Rehabilitation Psychology DO - 10.1037/rep0000569 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000569 ER -
APA
Lund, E. M., DeJesus, C. R., Carter, M. K. A., & Khazem, L. R. (2025). Positionality statements: Intersectional considerations for rehabilitation psychology.. Rehabilitation Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000569
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:22:45.488Z