Trauma, memory, and credibility in immigration proceedings: A qualitative study of legal advocates' use of forensic mental health assessments.
- DOI
- 10.1037/tra0002320
- Published
- 2026 Nov 9
- Container
- Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1037/tra0002320,
title = {Trauma, memory, and credibility in immigration proceedings: A qualitative study of legal advocates' use of forensic mental health assessments.},
author = {Rasmussen A and Coquillon E and Akinsulure-Smith AM and Rojas Nuñez J and Roman K and Skelton S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy},
doi = {10.1037/tra0002320},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002320}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Trauma, memory, and credibility in immigration proceedings: A qualitative study of legal advocates' use of forensic mental health assessments. AU - Rasmussen A AU - Coquillon E AU - Akinsulure-Smith AM AU - Rojas Nuñez J AU - Roman K AU - Skelton S PY - 2026 JO - Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy DO - 10.1037/tra0002320 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002320 ER -
APA
A, R., E, C., AM, A., J, R. N., K, R., & S, S. (2026). Trauma, memory, and credibility in immigration proceedings: A qualitative study of legal advocates' use of forensic mental health assessments.. Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002320
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T07:07:07.424Z