Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.
- DOI
- 10.1037/xan0000334
- Published
- 2022-07
- Container
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1037/xan0000334,
title = {Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.},
author = {Jérémie Jozefowiez and Gonzalo P. Urcelay and Ralph R. Miller},
year = {2022},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition},
doi = {10.1037/xan0000334},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000334}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias. AU - Jérémie Jozefowiez AU - Gonzalo P. Urcelay AU - Ralph R. Miller PY - 2022 JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition DO - 10.1037/xan0000334 UR - https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000334 ER -
APA
Jozefowiez, J., Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2022). Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000334
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T20:38:13.845Z