Double standards in judging collective action.

Reimer NK, Branković M, Essien I, Goh JX, Goudeau S, Lantos NA, Veldman J

DOI: 10.1037/xge0001743
Published: 2025 Jul
Container: Journal of experimental psychology. General
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1037/xge0001743,
  title = {Double standards in judging collective action.},
  author = {Reimer NK and Branković M and Essien I and Goh JX and Goudeau S and Lantos NA and Veldman J},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. General},
  doi = {10.1037/xge0001743},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001743}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Double standards in judging collective action.
AU  - Reimer NK
AU  - Branković M
AU  - Essien I
AU  - Goh JX
AU  - Goudeau S
AU  - Lantos NA
AU  - Veldman J
PY  - 2025
JO  - Journal of experimental psychology. General
DO  - 10.1037/xge0001743
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001743
ER  -

APA

NK, R., M, B., I, E., JX, G., S, G., NA, L., & J, V. (2025). Double standards in judging collective action.. Journal of experimental psychology. General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001743

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:39:44.800Z