Second-order suppression is not proactive: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.

Wang Y, Deng J, Lu Z, Ding Y, Qu Z

Open source

DOI
10.1037/xhp0001454
Published
2026 Nov
Container
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1037/xhp0001454,
  title = {Second-order suppression is not proactive: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.},
  author = {Wang Y and Deng J and Lu Z and Ding Y and Qu Z},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance},
  doi = {10.1037/xhp0001454},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001454}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Second-order suppression is not proactive: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.
AU  - Wang Y
AU  - Deng J
AU  - Lu Z
AU  - Ding Y
AU  - Qu Z
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
DO  - 10.1037/xhp0001454
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001454
ER  - 

APA

Y, W., J, D., Z, L., Y, D., & Z, Q. (2026). Second-order suppression is not proactive: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001454

Source records