Why a synthetic human genome is still worth building

Sudarshan Pinglay

Open source

DOI
10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z
Published
2026-06-03
Container
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z,
  title = {Why a synthetic human genome is still worth building},
  author = {Sudarshan Pinglay},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Nature},
  doi = {10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why a synthetic human genome is still worth building
AU  - Sudarshan Pinglay
PY  - 2026
JO  - Nature
DO  - 10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z
ER  - 

APA

Pinglay, S. (2026). Why a synthetic human genome is still worth building. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01725-z

Source records