Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.
- DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2808
- Published
- 2014 Mar
- Container
- Nature methods
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/nmeth.2808,
title = {Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.},
author = {Chenouard N and Smal I and de Chaumont F and Maška M and Sbalzarini IF and Gong Y and Cardinale J and Carthel C and Coraluppi S and Winter M and Cohen AR and Godinez WJ and Rohr K and Kalaidzidis Y and Liang L and Duncan J and Shen H and Xu Y and Magnusson KE and Jaldén J and Blau HM and Paul-Gilloteaux P and Roudot P and Kervrann C and Waharte F and Tinevez JY and Shorte SL and Willemse J and Celler K and van Wezel GP and Dan HW and Tsai YS and Ortiz de Solórzano C and Olivo-Marin JC and Meijering E},
year = {2014},
journal = {Nature methods},
doi = {10.1038/nmeth.2808},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. AU - Chenouard N AU - Smal I AU - de Chaumont F AU - Maška M AU - Sbalzarini IF AU - Gong Y AU - Cardinale J AU - Carthel C AU - Coraluppi S AU - Winter M AU - Cohen AR AU - Godinez WJ AU - Rohr K AU - Kalaidzidis Y AU - Liang L AU - Duncan J AU - Shen H AU - Xu Y AU - Magnusson KE AU - Jaldén J AU - Blau HM AU - Paul-Gilloteaux P AU - Roudot P AU - Kervrann C AU - Waharte F AU - Tinevez JY AU - Shorte SL AU - Willemse J AU - Celler K AU - van Wezel GP AU - Dan HW AU - Tsai YS AU - Ortiz de Solórzano C AU - Olivo-Marin JC AU - Meijering E PY - 2014 JO - Nature methods DO - 10.1038/nmeth.2808 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808 ER -
APA
N, C., I, S., F, D. C., M, M., IF, S., Y, G., J, C., C, C., S, C., M, W., AR, C., WJ, G., K, R., Y, K., L, L., J, D., H, S., Y, X., KE, M., J, J., HM, B., P, P., P, R., C, K., F, W., JY, T., SL, S., J, W., K, C., GP, V. W., HW, D., YS, T., C, O. D. S., JC, O., & E, M. (2014). Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.. Nature methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:14:15.632Z