Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology — concept and controversy
- DOI
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251
- Published
- 2016-01-18
- Container
- Nature Reviews Neurology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251,
title = {Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology — concept and controversy},
author = {Clifford R. Jack and David S. Knopman and Gaël Chételat and Dennis Dickson and Anne M. Fagan and Giovanni B. Frisoni and William Jagust and Elizabeth C. Mormino and Ronald C. Petersen and Reisa A. Sperling and Wiesje M. van der Flier and Victor L. Villemagne and Pieter J. Visser and Stephanie J. B. Vos},
year = {2016},
journal = {Nature Reviews Neurology},
doi = {10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology — concept and controversy AU - Clifford R. Jack AU - David S. Knopman AU - Gaël Chételat AU - Dennis Dickson AU - Anne M. Fagan AU - Giovanni B. Frisoni AU - William Jagust AU - Elizabeth C. Mormino AU - Ronald C. Petersen AU - Reisa A. Sperling AU - Wiesje M. van der Flier AU - Victor L. Villemagne AU - Pieter J. Visser AU - Stephanie J. B. Vos PY - 2016 JO - Nature Reviews Neurology DO - 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251 ER -
APA
Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Chételat, G., Dickson, D., Fagan, A. M., Frisoni, G. B., Jagust, W., Mormino, E. C., Petersen, R. C., Sperling, R. A., Flier, W. M. V. D., Villemagne, V. L., Visser, P. J., & Vos, S. J. B. (2016). Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology — concept and controversy. Nature Reviews Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T23:36:50.982Z