Correction to: Identifying performance differences between two pulse oximetry systems in simulated critical neonatal conditions.

King B, Dove J, McGonigle SJ, Ames WA, Vesoulis ZA

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y
Published
2026 Apr
Container
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y,
  title = {Correction to: Identifying performance differences between two pulse oximetry systems in simulated critical neonatal conditions.},
  author = {King B and Dove J and McGonigle SJ and Ames WA and Vesoulis ZA},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association},
  doi = {10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Correction to: Identifying performance differences between two pulse oximetry systems in simulated critical neonatal conditions.
AU  - King B
AU  - Dove J
AU  - McGonigle SJ
AU  - Ames WA
AU  - Vesoulis ZA
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
DO  - 10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y
ER  - 

APA

B, K., J, D., SJ, M., WA, A., & ZA, V. (2026). Correction to: Identifying performance differences between two pulse oximetry systems in simulated critical neonatal conditions.. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02405-y

Source records