Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x
- Published
- 2026 Sep 28
- Container
- Nature communications
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x,
title = {Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?},
author = {Ilgen AG and Borguet E and Geiger FM and Gibbs JM and Grassian VH and Jun YS and Kabengi N and Kubicki JD},
year = {2026},
journal = {Nature communications},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity? AU - Ilgen AG AU - Borguet E AU - Geiger FM AU - Gibbs JM AU - Grassian VH AU - Jun YS AU - Kabengi N AU - Kubicki JD PY - 2026 JO - Nature communications DO - 10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x ER -
APA
AG, I., E, B., FM, G., JM, G., VH, G., YS, J., N, K., & JD, K. (2026). Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?. Nature communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:56:56.246Z