Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?

Ilgen AG, Borguet E, Geiger FM, Gibbs JM, Grassian VH, Jun YS, Kabengi N, Kubicki JD

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x
Published
2026 Sep 28
Container
Nature communications
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x,
  title = {Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?},
  author = {Ilgen AG and Borguet E and Geiger FM and Gibbs JM and Grassian VH and Jun YS and Kabengi N and Kubicki JD},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Nature communications},
  doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?
AU  - Ilgen AG
AU  - Borguet E
AU  - Geiger FM
AU  - Gibbs JM
AU  - Grassian VH
AU  - Jun YS
AU  - Kabengi N
AU  - Kubicki JD
PY  - 2026
JO  - Nature communications
DO  - 10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x
ER  - 

APA

AG, I., E, B., FM, G., JM, G., VH, G., YS, J., N, K., & JD, K. (2026). Reply to: Should we return to probability distributions to represent interfacial reactivity?. Nature communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78021-x

Source records