Restoration science does not need redefinition

James C. Aronson, Daniel Simberloff, Anthony Ricciardi, Neva Goodwin

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0
Published
2018-03-26
Container
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0,
  title = {Restoration science does not need redefinition},
  author = {James C. Aronson and Daniel Simberloff and Anthony Ricciardi and Neva Goodwin},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Nature Ecology \& Evolution},
  doi = {10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Restoration science does not need redefinition
AU  - James C. Aronson
AU  - Daniel Simberloff
AU  - Anthony Ricciardi
AU  - Neva Goodwin
PY  - 2018
JO  - Nature Ecology & Evolution
DO  - 10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0
ER  - 

APA

Aronson, J. C., Simberloff, D., Ricciardi, A., & Goodwin, N. (2018). Restoration science does not need redefinition. Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0536-0

Source records