Pulsed field ablation versus conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 4-year outcomes in the ADVENT-LTO study.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4
- Published
- 2026 Apr
- Container
- Nature medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4,
title = {Pulsed field ablation versus conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 4-year outcomes in the ADVENT-LTO study.},
author = {Reddy VY and Gerstenfeld EP and Mountantonakis SE and Patel C and Ellenbogen KA and Harding JD and Gibson DN and Natale A and Waks JW and Calkins H and Gupta SK and Woods CE and Whang W and Daccarett M and Cuoco FA and Delurgio DB and Richards E and Martens MD and Sutton B and Mansour M and ADVENT-LTO Study Investigators},
year = {2026},
journal = {Nature medicine},
doi = {10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Pulsed field ablation versus conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 4-year outcomes in the ADVENT-LTO study. AU - Reddy VY AU - Gerstenfeld EP AU - Mountantonakis SE AU - Patel C AU - Ellenbogen KA AU - Harding JD AU - Gibson DN AU - Natale A AU - Waks JW AU - Calkins H AU - Gupta SK AU - Woods CE AU - Whang W AU - Daccarett M AU - Cuoco FA AU - Delurgio DB AU - Richards E AU - Martens MD AU - Sutton B AU - Mansour M AU - ADVENT-LTO Study Investigators PY - 2026 JO - Nature medicine DO - 10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4 ER -
APA
VY, R., EP, G., SE, M., C, P., KA, E., JD, H., DN, G., A, N., JW, W., H, C., SK, G., CE, W., W, W., M, D., FA, C., DB, D., E, R., MD, M., B, S., M, M., & Investigators, A. S. (2026). Pulsed field ablation versus conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 4-year outcomes in the ADVENT-LTO study.. Nature medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04246-4
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:59:09.569Z