Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0
- Published
- 2019 Jul
- Container
- Nature methods
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0,
title = {Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.},
author = {Donnelly DP and Rawlins CM and DeHart CJ and Fornelli L and Schachner LF and Lin Z and Lippens JL and Aluri KC and Sarin R and Chen B and Lantz C and Jung W and Johnson KR and Koller A and Wolff JJ and Campuzano IDG and Auclair JR and Ivanov AR and Whitelegge JP and Paša-Tolić L and Chamot-Rooke J and Danis PO and Smith LM and Tsybin YO and Loo JA and Ge Y and Kelleher NL and Agar JN},
year = {2019},
journal = {Nature methods},
doi = {10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry. AU - Donnelly DP AU - Rawlins CM AU - DeHart CJ AU - Fornelli L AU - Schachner LF AU - Lin Z AU - Lippens JL AU - Aluri KC AU - Sarin R AU - Chen B AU - Lantz C AU - Jung W AU - Johnson KR AU - Koller A AU - Wolff JJ AU - Campuzano IDG AU - Auclair JR AU - Ivanov AR AU - Whitelegge JP AU - Paša-Tolić L AU - Chamot-Rooke J AU - Danis PO AU - Smith LM AU - Tsybin YO AU - Loo JA AU - Ge Y AU - Kelleher NL AU - Agar JN PY - 2019 JO - Nature methods DO - 10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0 ER -
APA
DP, D., CM, R., CJ, D., L, F., LF, S., Z, L., JL, L., KC, A., R, S., B, C., C, L., W, J., KR, J., A, K., JJ, W., IDG, C., JR, A., AR, I., JP, W., L, P., J, C., PO, D., LM, S., YO, T., JA, L., Y, G., NL, K., & JN, A. (2019). Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.. Nature methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:26:10.998Z