Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies—from collection through analysis
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y
- Published
- 2022-07-26
- Container
- Scientific Data
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y,
title = {Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies—from collection through analysis},
author = {Kristi L. Wallace and Marcus I. Bursik and Stephen Kuehn and Andrei V. Kurbatov and Peter Abbott and Costanza Bonadonna and Katharine Cashman and Siwan M. Davies and Britta Jensen and Christine Lane and Gill Plunkett and Victoria C. Smith and Emma Tomlinson and Thor Thordarsson and J. Douglas Walker},
year = {2022},
journal = {Scientific Data},
doi = {10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies—from collection through analysis AU - Kristi L. Wallace AU - Marcus I. Bursik AU - Stephen Kuehn AU - Andrei V. Kurbatov AU - Peter Abbott AU - Costanza Bonadonna AU - Katharine Cashman AU - Siwan M. Davies AU - Britta Jensen AU - Christine Lane AU - Gill Plunkett AU - Victoria C. Smith AU - Emma Tomlinson AU - Thor Thordarsson AU - J. Douglas Walker PY - 2022 JO - Scientific Data DO - 10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y ER -
APA
Wallace, K. L., Bursik, M. I., Kuehn, S., Kurbatov, A. V., Abbott, P., Bonadonna, C., Cashman, K., Davies, S. M., Jensen, B., Lane, C., Plunkett, G., Smith, V. C., Tomlinson, E., Thordarsson, T., & Walker, J. D. (2022). Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies—from collection through analysis. Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:23:45.410Z