eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9
- Published
- 2021 Mar 25
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9,
title = {eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants.},
author = {Nørgaard L and Olesen CR and Trøjelsgaard K and Pertoldi C and Nielsen JL and Taberlet P and Ruiz-González A and De Barba M and Iacolina L},
year = {2021},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants. AU - Nørgaard L AU - Olesen CR AU - Trøjelsgaard K AU - Pertoldi C AU - Nielsen JL AU - Taberlet P AU - Ruiz-González A AU - De Barba M AU - Iacolina L PY - 2021 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9 ER -
APA
L, N., CR, O., K, T., C, P., JL, N., P, T., A, R., M, D. B., & L, I. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9