Uncertainty in experts' judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals' cognitive abilities.

Sándor K, Könnyű B, Miklósi Á

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x
Published: 2021 Aug 10
Container: Scientific reports
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x,
  title = {Uncertainty in experts' judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals' cognitive abilities.},
  author = {Sándor K and Könnyű B and Miklósi Á},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Scientific reports},
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Uncertainty in experts' judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals' cognitive abilities.
AU  - Sándor K
AU  - Könnyű B
AU  - Miklósi Á
PY  - 2021
JO  - Scientific reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x
ER  -

APA

K, S., B, K., & Á, M. (2021). Uncertainty in experts' judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals' cognitive abilities.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95384-x

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:15:15.397Z