Unexpected involvement of a second rodent species makes impacts of introduced rats more difficult to detect.

Lambert M, Carlisle S, Cain I, Douse A, Watt L

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z
Published
2021 Oct 5
Container
Scientific reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z,
  title = {Unexpected involvement of a second rodent species makes impacts of introduced rats more difficult to detect.},
  author = {Lambert M and Carlisle S and Cain I and Douse A and Watt L},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Scientific reports},
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Unexpected involvement of a second rodent species makes impacts of introduced rats more difficult to detect.
AU  - Lambert M
AU  - Carlisle S
AU  - Cain I
AU  - Douse A
AU  - Watt L
PY  - 2021
JO  - Scientific reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z
ER  - 

APA

M, L., S, C., I, C., A, D., & L, W. (2021). Unexpected involvement of a second rodent species makes impacts of introduced rats more difficult to detect.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98956-z

Source records