Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y
- Published
- 2023-02-03
- Container
- Scientific Reports
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y,
title = {Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response},
author = {Satoshi Nozaki and Yuka Nakatani and Aya Mawatari and Nina Shibata and William E. Hume and Emi Hayashinaka and Yasuhiro Wada and Hisashi Doi and Yasuyoshi Watanabe},
year = {2023},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response AU - Satoshi Nozaki AU - Yuka Nakatani AU - Aya Mawatari AU - Nina Shibata AU - William E. Hume AU - Emi Hayashinaka AU - Yasuhiro Wada AU - Hisashi Doi AU - Yasuyoshi Watanabe PY - 2023 JO - Scientific Reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y ER -
APA
Nozaki, S., Nakatani, Y., Mawatari, A., Shibata, N., Hume, W. E., Hayashinaka, E., Wada, Y., Doi, H., & Watanabe, Y. (2023). Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:07:04.830Z