Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8
- Published
- 2023 Mar 17
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8,
title = {Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.},
author = {Seymen AA and Gulten E and Ozgur E and Ortaç B and Akdemir I and Cinar G and Saricaoglu EM and Guney-Esken G and Akkus E and Can F and Karahan ZC and Azap A and Tuncay E},
year = {2023},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing. AU - Seymen AA AU - Gulten E AU - Ozgur E AU - Ortaç B AU - Akdemir I AU - Cinar G AU - Saricaoglu EM AU - Guney-Esken G AU - Akkus E AU - Can F AU - Karahan ZC AU - Azap A AU - Tuncay E PY - 2023 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8 ER -
APA
AA, S., E, G., E, O., B, O., I, A., G, C., EM, S., G, G., E, A., F, C., ZC, K., A, A., & E, T. (2023). Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:34:06.936Z