Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.

Seymen AA, Gulten E, Ozgur E, Ortaç B, Akdemir I, Cinar G, Saricaoglu EM, Guney-Esken G, Akkus E, Can F, Karahan ZC, Azap A, Tuncay E

Open source

DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8
Published
2023 Mar 17
Container
Scientific reports
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8,
  title = {Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.},
  author = {Seymen AA and Gulten E and Ozgur E and Ortaç B and Akdemir I and Cinar G and Saricaoglu EM and Guney-Esken G and Akkus E and Can F and Karahan ZC and Azap A and Tuncay E},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Scientific reports},
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.
AU  - Seymen AA
AU  - Gulten E
AU  - Ozgur E
AU  - Ortaç B
AU  - Akdemir I
AU  - Cinar G
AU  - Saricaoglu EM
AU  - Guney-Esken G
AU  - Akkus E
AU  - Can F
AU  - Karahan ZC
AU  - Azap A
AU  - Tuncay E
PY  - 2023
JO  - Scientific reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8
ER  - 

APA

AA, S., E, G., E, O., B, O., I, A., G, C., EM, S., G, G., E, A., F, C., ZC, K., A, A., & E, T. (2023). Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOVIR SARS-CoV-2 ultra-rapid antigen test performance compared to PCR-based testing.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31177-8

Source records