Assessing peptic ulcer risk with the HAMPROW score in the general Chinese population.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0
- Published
- 2024 Feb 23
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0,
title = {Assessing peptic ulcer risk with the HAMPROW score in the general Chinese population.},
author = {Wang B and Yu W and Zhang Z and Jin W and Chen H and Wang L and Xu M and Hou C and Qian Z and Qiu Z and Zhang S},
year = {2024},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing peptic ulcer risk with the HAMPROW score in the general Chinese population. AU - Wang B AU - Yu W AU - Zhang Z AU - Jin W AU - Chen H AU - Wang L AU - Xu M AU - Hou C AU - Qian Z AU - Qiu Z AU - Zhang S PY - 2024 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0 ER -
APA
B, W., W, Y., Z, Z., W, J., H, C., L, W., M, X., C, H., Z, Q., Z, Q., & S, Z. (2024). Assessing peptic ulcer risk with the HAMPROW score in the general Chinese population.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:44:17.694Z