Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3
- Published
- 2024 Aug 27
- Container
- Scientific reports
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3,
title = {Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.},
author = {Hwang YH and Kim JS and Chough CK and Cho J and Kim HS and Jang JW and Park CK and Lee CW and Park MK and Son SK and Park JY},
year = {2024},
journal = {Scientific reports},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy. AU - Hwang YH AU - Kim JS AU - Chough CK AU - Cho J AU - Kim HS AU - Jang JW AU - Park CK AU - Lee CW AU - Park MK AU - Son SK AU - Park JY PY - 2024 JO - Scientific reports DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3 ER -
APA
YH, H., JS, K., CK, C., J, C., HS, K., JW, J., CK, P., CW, L., MK, P., SK, S., & JY, P. (2024). Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:02:25.963Z